Body proportions and somatotype in students of the degree program in physical education, recreation, and sports: A study at the University of Atlántico (Original)
Keywords:
somatotype, body proportions, physical education, anthropometry, teacher training.Abstract
This study aimed to characterize the body proportions and somatotype of students enrolled in the Bachelor's Degree Program in Physical Education, Recreation, and Sports at the University of Atlántico. Using a quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional design, 33 students were evaluated through standardized anthropometric techniques (ISAK). Basic measurements, diameters, perimeters, skinfolds, somatotype components, and somatotype coordinates were analyzed. Results showed an average mesoendomorphic somatotype (endomorphy: 2.92; mesomorphy: 3.16; ectomorphy: 2.52), indicating a predominance of muscle mass and robust structure, along with moderate adipose tissue levels. Morphological heterogeneity was observed across several variables, highlighting the need to adapt pedagogical strategies to the students' physical characteristics. These findings provide a reference profile for curriculum planning, sports guidance, and institutional wellness policies within the training of future professionals in physical education and sports.
Downloads
References
Carter, J. E. L., & Heath, B. H. (1990). Somatotyping: Development and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Caspersen, C. J., Powell, K. E., & Christenson, G. M. (1985). Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports, 100(2), 126–131.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Durnin, J. V. G. A., & Womersley, J. (1974). Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: Measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition, 32(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19740060
Heath, B. H., & Carter, J. E. L. (1967). A modified somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 27(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330270108
Heyward, V. H., & Wagner, D. R. (2004). Applied body composition assessment (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento: Métodos de investigación en ciencias sociales. McGraw-Hill.
Lee, C. M. Y., Huxley, R. R., Wildman, R. P., & Woodward, M. (2008). Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(7), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.012
Marfell-Jones, M., Stewart, A., & de Ridder, J. (2012). International standards for anthropometric assessment (ISAK). International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry.
Norton, K., & Olds, T. (2000). Anthropometrica: A textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses. UNSW Press.
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2022). Índice de masa corporal: clasificación. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight
Wilmore, J. H., & Costill, D. L. (2007). Physiology of sport and exercise (4th ed.). Human Kinetics
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista científica Olimpia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
