Socio-productive innovation: Generation of democratic interactoral networks as an instrument to promote local development (Original)

Authors

  • Valeria Fenoglio CIECS-CONICET-UNC

Keywords:

technological innovation; interactional networks; local development; cognitive democracy; social technology

Abstract

The present work refers to the generation of technological innovations that attempt to articulate local productive developments, environmental sustainability and cognitive democracy. This last aspect points to the importance of the democratization of productive decisions and the consensual distribution of benefits in processes related to local development. Through an investigation of the interpretative type, an experience is taken as a case study in the city of Concordia, Argentina, which collectively develops a technology related to construction systems in wood, with the aim of promoting solidarity productive processes based on local resources and knowledge. From a critical position and participatory action in territory, the experience proposes an innovation that tries to modify the current productive modes, overcoming the unidirectional technological transfer, by new forms of solving problems in a collective and solidary way. In methodological terms, it is based on the recognition of strongly installed local capacities, creating new spaces based on establishing alliances and relationships between different actors and / or sectors. In this framework, the main objective of this work is to analyze and interpret the case study from analytical categories that emerge from the theoretical perspective of the Social Studies of Science and Technology (ESCyT) as an interdisciplinary field that studies and questions the cultural, ethical and political effects of scientific knowledge and technological innovation.

Author Biography

  • Valeria Fenoglio, CIECS-CONICET-UNC

    Investigadora en el Centro de investigaciones de Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas y de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (CIECS-CONICET-UNC), Argentina

References

DAGNINO, R. (2008). Neutralidade da ciencia e determinismo tecnológico. Um debate sobre a tecnociencia. Brasil: Unicamp editorial.
FRESSOLI, M., SMITH, A., Thomas, H. y BORTZ, G. (2016). De las Tecnologías Apropiadas a las Tecnologías Sociales: algunos dilemas persistentes de los movimientos de innovación de base para la construcción de futuros socialmente justos. En: Tecnologías para Incluir. Ocho análisis socio-técnicos orientados al diseño estratégico de artefactos y normativas. Argentina. Quilmes: Editorial Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología.
HERRERA, A. (2010). La generación de tecnologías en las zonas rurales. En Dagnino (Ed), Tecnologia social. Ferramenta para construer outra sociedade (pp 23-51) Campinas, Brasil: Komedi
KAZEZ, Ruth. Los estudios de caso y el problema de la selección de la muestra. Aporte del sistema de matrices de datos. Subjetividad y Procesos cognitivos [en línea]. 2009, vol. 13, nº1, pp.71-89. [Consultado 14 de octubre de 2015]
PEYLOUBET, P. (2018). Convidar Tecnología. Una propuesta a partir de la Co-construcción. Buenos Aires: Editorial Diseño
SERAFIM, M. y DAGNINO, R. (2007). Porque é difícil incorporar as demandas sociais na PCT? Congreso Argentino de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y de la Tecnología. Ponencia llevada a cabo en el I Congreso Argentino de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y de la Tecnología, Quilmes.
THOMAS, H. y BECERRA, L. (2014). Sistemas tecnológicos para el desarrollo inclusivo sustentable. Revista Voces en el Fénix, nº 37, pp. 120-129
VASILACHIS DE GIALDINO, I. (2006). Estrategias de investigación cualitativa. España, Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa

Published

2019-08-28

How to Cite

Socio-productive innovation: Generation of democratic interactoral networks as an instrument to promote local development (Original). (2019). REDEL. Revista Granmense De Desarrollo Local, 3(3), 74-87. https://revistas.udg.co.cu/index.php/redel/article/view/879