Diagnosis for decision-making in the high performance management of INDER (Original)
Keywords:
high yield; diagnostic; directive; taking of decisions.Abstract
In this article the diagnosis is presented that was developed to propose the design of a model of taking of decisions that it would be implemented in the address of the high Cuban yield, being able to benefit to its members in the employment of a new conception of theoretical-practical work, being able to influence in the organizational results, starting from the base of the necessities and potentialities that have all the involved human resources. The objective of the present study consisted on determining a diagnosis to design a model of taking of decisions. The investigation demanded the use of diverse methods among those that should be enunciated: you interview, interviews and the scientific observation. The key informant was used for the obtaining of essential data in the identification of the investigation; as well as the consultation to experts and the approach of users. The main existent problems were identified for the taking of decisions and they were arrived to the results of the diagnosis having like sample the members of the National Address of High Yield of the INDER, being recognized the utility and relevancy of the results that they were obtained.
Downloads
References
Codina, A. (2016). Indicadores para la toma de decisionesefectivas. Theuarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (1): 26-37.
Coulter, I. (2016). Factorescondicionantes para la toma de decisiones efectivas en el deporte de altacompetición. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33, 50-61.
Crespo, T. (2007). Respuestas a 16 preguntas sobre el empleo del experto en la investigaciónpedagógica. Lima: Edit. San Marcos.
Díaz, J. (2017). Toma de decisiones: el imperativo diario de la vida en la organización moderna. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3): 488-500.
Hernández y Fonseca. (2019). Modelo para el proceso de toma de decisiones en la dirección nacional de alto rendimiento del Inder. Tesis Doctoral en Administración y Gestión de la Cultura Física y el Deporte. La Habana. Universidad de Ciencias de la Cultura Física.
Forrester, F. (2018). La participación popular en el proceso de toma dedecisiones. Harvard Business Review, Julio-Agosto. pp 150-160.
Freeman, R. (2017). La toma de decisionesproceso vital en la estrategiaempresarial. Proposal Management, primavera. pp 31-42.
García, L., Araújo, D., Carvalho, J. yDel Villar, F. (2017). Panorámica de las teorías y métodos de investigación en torno a la toma de decisiones en la gestión deportiva. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 20 (2).
Gómez, S. (2018), “El aprendizaje organizacional y el capital intelectual”. Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 20, Núm. 10, pp. 34-40.
Menguzzato, M. y Renau, J.J. (2013). La dirección estratégica en las instituciones. Valencia: Prentice-Hall.
Moreno, A. (2018). Caracterización del proceso de toma de decisiones en el futbol español. Revista de Psicología del Deporte. Vol. 20, núm. 2, pp. 785-800. Moreno: 1.
Olivé, R. (2010). The effect of exercise on cognitive performance insoccerspecific tests. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15, 459-468.
Paul, C. (2019). Indicadores para la toma de decisiones en la formulación de Políticas Públicas. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 17(6): 298-306.
Simón, R. (1989). Los servicios de consultaría orientados a la toma dedecisiones. European Management Journal, 19 (5): 552-559.
